WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners. By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles. Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime. |
England rugby player Billy Vunipola arrested and fined after nightclub incident on Spain islandCBA playoffs: Liaoning sweep Shenzhen to reach semisChinese mainland, HK resume normal travel after three yearsChina releases report on global meteorological development in 2023Yang sets national record in women's 100m freestyleCourtois has surgery after another knee injuryGlobal political party media officials discuss China's modernizationIOC launches innovative Paris 2024 mobile gameMagnificent view of Three Gorges on Yangtze RiverChina defender Zhang backtracks on retirement claim